Evaluating Local Public Health Practice
Sharing our learning from the Public Health Practice Evaluation Scheme (PHPES)
25 January 2017, 12.00 to 16.00
About the Public Health Practice Evaluation Scheme
SPHR’s goal is to produce high quality evidence for public health practice to improve population health and reduce health inequalities. To achieve this, the School must address the challenges faced by public health practitioners working on the ‘front line’ – in the NHS, in local authority public health teams, in other local authority departments including social care, schools and transport and in the third sector.
To help us respond to these challenges we have set up the Public Health Practice Evaluation Scheme (PHPES). We’re delighted that the scheme now operates in collaboration with Public Health England. PHPES enables people working in public health who are introducing innovative initiatives aimed at improving health, to work in partnership with SPHR to conduct rigorous evaluations of their cost-effectiveness. The scheme is particularly focused on local public health initiatives, rather than projects that are part of national programmes.
What PHPES offers:
The scheme offers public health practitioners working in any sector an exciting opportunity to:
- Collaborate with leading population health scientists to evaluate your practice
- Gain national profile for your work
- Provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness of your work that others can use
- The possibility that your project or initiative will be replicated in other areas
Applications were welcomed from people working across the public health community, in the NHS, local authority, clinical commissioning groups, screening teams and third sector organisations.
Projects or initiative can be focused on changing the environment in which people live and work – natural, built, social, financial, regulatory and cultural, promoting healthy individual behaviour, or both. We also consider those aimed at improving population health services.
For more information see our website http://sphr.nihr.ac.uk/phpes/
Presentations for four local evaluations
Doncaster Foundation for Change Domestic Abuse Perpetrators Programme
Leads: Steve Ariss and Parveen Ali, University of Sheffield
Domestic abuse has been identified as a pressing public health issue, but one with a very weak evidence base to inform intervention design and delivery. To-date there has been only one evaluation of a perpetrator programme for voluntary participants in the UK. There is a need for more theory-driven evaluations of community-based interventions for perpetrators to enable greater understanding of how such interventions operate to effect change, the optimal components of such interventions, and how they can be successfully implemented in practice.
The research is being carried out by a team of researchers across ScHARR and the School of Nursing and Midwifery. The project is supported by public health commissioners and the wider domestic abuse strategy group at Doncaster, as well as the provider organisation that is delivering the intervention, Foundation.
To see the slides from this presentation follow the link below
The Health Inequalities Impact of Reducing the Cost of Local Authority Leisure Facilities in the North West
Leads: Ben Barr and Emma Halliday, LiLaC
This research will evaluate the health inequalities impact of variations in the pricing policy of local authority supported leisure facilities, including concessionary schemes, free offers and differences in standard prices.
Our approach follows 5 linked stages to investigate the relationships that link the investment of public money in subsidising leisure facilities to the potential impacts of this on health inequalities. Firstly we will undertake a detailed exploration of the components of pricing policy in each area, and how these have changed over time. Secondly using data extracted from leisure management systems we will use quasi-experimental methods to investigate how pricing structures and offers have affected the participation of different socioeconomic groups. Thirdly we will use qualitative interviews with members of the public to explore how cost influences participation. Fourthly we will investigate the association between the level of subsidy of leisure facilities and participation using national datasets.
To see the slides from this presentation follow the links below
The Time Credit Programme in Wisbech, Cambridgeshire
Leads: Louise Lafortune and Gemma Burgess, Cambridge University
In collaboration with the Cambridgeshire County Council Community Engagement Team and SPICE, we are conducting an evaluation of the Time Credit programme in Wisbech. In the Time Credit model, people earn Time Credits by giving their time to local service and groups – one Time Credit is earned for each hour of time given. People can then ‘spend’ Time Credits to access events, training and leisure activities provided by public, community and private organisations. Time Credits are a unique tool to enable engagement with some of the most vulnerable members of the community and reduce social isolation. The evaluation will assess the impact of this model on health and social well-being.
To see the slides from this presentation follow link below.
Football as a mental health intervention – the Coping Through Football evaluation
Leads: Bettina Friedrich and Oliver Mason, UCL
Coping Through Football is a transformational project that demonstrates how two sporting charities, London Playing Fields Foundation and Leyton Orient Trust, can work with the NHS (in the shape of NELFT) to produce a sustainable recovery model approach to engage with and improve the wellbeing of adults and young people experiencing mental health issues. The project aims to show how sport can: 1) help tackle stigma and discrimination, 2) can work together with the health sector on shared agendas to reduce inequalities, 3) be a tool for engagement with hard to reach groups and 4) assist in the recovery of those with mental ill health. Researchers at the Department for Clinical Educational and Health Psychology are currently evaluating CTF to assess the impact of this project with regard to a number of quantitative and qualitative outcome measures.
To see the slides from this presentation follow links below.
Other Current School for Public Health Research PHPES Projects
Mentoring vulnerable and excluded adolescents to achieve better health and well-being: A feasibility study and pilot randomised control trial (RCT) of the Breakthrough Mentoring Scheme. Lead: Professor Rona Campbell, University of Bristol
Evaluation of a complex intervention to promote increased smoking cessation rates among pregnant women in maternity care. Lead: Ruth Bell, FUSE
DrinkThink: Alcohol screening and brief intervention for young people in youth, social service, and healthcare settings: A mixed-method evaluation and intervention development study. Lead: Matthew Hickman (University of Bristol)
Evaluating the impact of a cumulative impact policies to reduce alcohol-related harms in Islington local authority. Lead: Karen Lock, LSHTM
Community-based Prevention of Diabetes (ComPoD): A randomised trial with a waiting list control group to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a third sector-led, community-based diabetes prevention programme (the “Living Well, Taking Control” programme). Lead: Jane Smith, University of Exeter Medical School
Evaluation of the London-wide HIV Prevention Programme (LHPP). Leads: Fiona Burns and Alison Rodger
Exposing the impact of advice services on health and inequalities. Lead: Sue Carr, FUSE
Stoke-on-Trent Smokefree Homes Service Evaluation. Lead: frank De Vocht, University of Bristol
Evaluation of Sheffield City Council “Housing +” programme. Lead: Elizabeth Goyder, University of Sheffield
Evaluation of the Public Health Alcohol Licencing (PHAL) Tool. Lead: Karen Lock, LSHTM
What is needed to implement and evaluate the Falls Prevention Programme in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough most effectively? – Learning from pilot projects. Lead: Louise Lafortune and Jane Fleming, University of Cambridge
Ways to Wellness: feasibility study of the impact of a social prescribing intervention. Lead: Suzanne Moffatt, FUSE